The Peru Support Group
PSG logo
 

   
 
  TRADE AGREEMENTS  

ARTICLE: What will the Free Trade Agreement mean for Peruvians?
On 7 December 2005, there was finally cause for celebration in Washington. The Peruvian and US delegation closed what had been a protracted, but ultimately successful, Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiation between their two countries. Read full story (PDF format, 44kb)


TRADE AGREEMENTS
Negotiations are underway to extend NAFTA (the North American Free trade Agreement) - currently covering USA Canada and Mexico - to every other country in South and Central America except Cuba, creating the largest free trade area in the world, the Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA). Negotiations will conclude in January 2005.

The proposal was launched in 1994 at the Miami 'Summit of the Americas' but took off properly in 1998 when a Trade Negotiations Committee was formed. The agreement will cover agriculture, investment, dispute settlement, intellectual property rights, subsidies and anti-dumping, competition, government procurement and market access.

Special committees were created to discuss participation of smaller economies, e-commerce and civil society participation. However NGO's are concerned that there is no real mechanism for civil society participation, and that the committee is little more than lip service.

Advocates of the FTAA argue that creating a massive free trade area will draw new investment to developing countries like Peru, create new jobs and increase export opportunities. Those in opposition point out that free trade rarely benefits those who are economically weak and who are therefore unable to defend whatever right they may have in theory. One million manufacturing jobs were lost in the US when companies relocated to take advantage of cheaper labour in Mexico, in Mexico one million workers in maquilladora factories near the US border earn less than the minimum wage of $5 a day.
Extending NAFTA to the whole of the Americas may well increase the power of corporations' vs countries. Protection of investors' rights enables corporations to sue governments for national laws covering public health and safety which are judged to impinge on them. Cases of corporations receiving substantial damages have already occurred in US, Canada and Mexico. There are questions over whether countries will be forced to accept GM foods, this has caused concern among NGOs that the FTAA may further weaken the agricultural economy of many Latin American countries.

Intellectual Property Rights may also be extended throughout the Americas, with the result that Pharmaceutical companies could keep their monopoly on manufacture of essential drugs, keep prices high and forbid the production of generic versions. Intellectual Property Rights grants 'ownership' of drugs extracted from natural plants to whoever files a patent first, laying traditional medicine open to 'biopiracy' by companies.

Despite the possible negative effects of such an agreement it seems that many Latin American countries are more concerned about the effects of being left out. But the rules that govern the FTAA are still to be finalised - Brasil for one, will play an important part in the design of this.

back to top


 
  FAIR TRADE  
 

Article by John Crabtree
You may think that the price of coffee on the supermarket shelves only goes up, never down. But to Third World coffee growers, the international price is at it lowest for 30 years. Many producers carry on only because they cannot do anything else or because they think that eventually the world price will pick up.
But this is not the case in Pite, a remote community in the far north of Peru, close to the border with Ecuador. Its coffee farmers have not only turned into being exporters - itself a minor revolution for those with only tiny plots of 3-5 hectares - but are doing so at a profit, thanks to the Fair Trade movement.

To them, Fair Trade is almost literally a matter of life and death. With the world price of coffee at around 48 dollars per quintal (100 lbs), Fair Trade offers them a guaranteed floor price of 126 dollars a quintal. No-one in Pite can produce coffee for 48 dollars a quintal, once all their costs are taken into account, and these are not the sort of farmers able to sustain losses.

Joel Correa, for one, is well pleased how things are going. Not only is he receiving a reasonable price whereas many other producers in the region think it's hardly worth harvesting their coffee this year, but he has increased the yield on his plot from 1 quintal per hectare six years ago to 6-8 quintales now. He is investing the profit he makes into a small plant to produce a kind of raw sugar (panela) which will provide his household with some income once the cash from the coffee harvest (which comes once a year) is all spent.
Correa is also able to take advantage of the fact that his coffee is organically produced, which means that it commands an extra 10 dollars a quintal on the market. To qualify as organic, coffee production has to conform to a number of basic norms, as well as avoiding the use of fertilizers, pesticides and other chemicals. Many peruvian producers can qualify as organic because unlike many colombian coffee growers, they've never had the money to buy fertilizers.

Many farmers in the highlands of eastern Piura department are following Correa's example and becoming members of the Central Piurana de Cafetaleros, Cepicafé. Formed in 1995 as a non-profit organisation, Cepicafé, now has more than 1,400 members in 35 communities stretching from places like Pite, near Montero, in the north-east of Piura southwards into Huancabamba province.

Cepicafé's main function is to buy members' coffee harvests and to export it direct to Fair Trade institutions in the United States and Europe, passing on to the producers these the advantages of eliminating middlemen and selling coffee at a slight premium in those markets. It also provides technical assistance to growers to help them to certify themselves as organic producers. Furthermore, it can provide members with credit, a scarce commodity in rural Peru since former president Alberto Fujimori shut down the Agrarian Bank in 1991.

Partly because of the activities of Cepicafé and organisations like it elsewhere, coffee exports have increased in recent years, turning coffee into Peru's single most important export commodity. However, most Peruvians continue to sell through a chain of intermediaries which means that they receive a reduced cut on an all-time low price. In San Martín, for example, in the jungle fringe to the south-east of Piura, producers currently receive from local middlemen about 80 soles (22.85 dollars) for each quintal of coffee, with exporters taking most of the difference between that and the New York price.

For many coffee growers in San Martín, the answer to their economic predicament is to turn to coca. The increase in coffee production in San Martín had been part of a drive by USAID and others to substitute coca with other crops, taking advantage of the fact that in the mid 1990s the price of coca was low and the international price for coffee was high. Since the late 1990s, however, the trends have been the reverse: coffee prices have collapsed and coca prices have recovered. Hectare for hectare, a farmer can now make ten times more cash from growing coca than coffee. Many farmers are now wary that coca production brings with it other problems - violence, prostitution, the threat of eradication, to name but a few - but the price differential is such as to override such considerations.

So, it is perhaps worth remembering that when you next visit your local supermarket, the little extra you pay to buy Fair Trade Peruvian not only gives you great quality coffee. It keeps farmers like Joel Correa in business and does something to reduce the incentives to grow crops that produce drugs.

The author has recently returned from visiting coffee growers in Piura and San Martín as a consultant for Oxfam.

back to top